Registrar Entrar
ANCCANCC
  • HOME
  • SOBRE A ANCC
  • GALERIA
  • EVENTOS
  • NOTICÍAS
  • CONTATOS
  • DOAÇÕES
  • HOME
  • SOBRE A ANCC
  • GALERIA
  • EVENTOS
  • NOTICÍAS
  • CONTATOS
  • DOAÇÕES

kra28 cc

ANCC – Associação Nacional de Caça e Conservação › Fóruns › Eduma Forum › kra28 cc

Marcado: kra28 cc

Este tópico contém 0 resposta, possui 1 voz e foi atualizado pela última vez por  Mosesuphop 1 ano, 4 meses atrás.

Visualizando 1 post (de 1 do total)
  • Autor
    Posts
  • 30 de janeiro de 2025 às 01:02 #1685069

    Mosesuphop
    Participante

    The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
    [url=https://kra26c.cc]kraken market[/url]

    Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.

    The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
    https://kra26c.cc
    kra28 cc
    The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.

    So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?

    In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.

    Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
    But does that still hold true in 2024?

    According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.

    “There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”

    “If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

    Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”

  • Autor
    Posts
Visualizando 1 post (de 1 do total)

Você deve fazer login para responder a este tópico.

Posts recentes

  • Qual a diferença do javali, cateto e queixada?
  • Colégio da Polícia Militar de Goiás é referência em todo país
  • O Que é o Cr, Certificado De Registro?
  • AGCC AUXILIA DEPUTADO VALDIR COLATTO EM PROJETO QUE REGULAMENTA CAÇA DE ANIMAIS SILVESTRES

Comentários

    Arquivos

    • fevereiro 2019
    • janeiro 2019
    • fevereiro 2017

    Categorias

    • ANCC
    • face
    • Sem categoria
    ancc-logo

    ANCC é formada por caçadores e tem por finalidade a defesa e conservação do meio ambiente, lutando pela regulamentação da caça no Brasil.

    • Rua J 69 Qd.121 Lt 01 - Setor Jaó, Goiânia - GO, 74.674-360
    • +55 (62) 3204-6543
    • atendimento@ancc.org.br

    SOBRE NOS

    • SOBRE A ANCC
    • GALERIA
    • EVENTOS

    IMPORTANTE

    • NOTICÍAS
    • CONTATO

    Siga a gente

    • Facebook
    • Instagram

    Receba as últimas notícias da ANCC




    Copyright © 2017 ancc.org.br - Todos os direitos reservados.